Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.55
Change+$8.70 (+9.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$10.54
Change+$0.61 (+6.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets182.58M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. WMMCX (183M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.39) vs WMMCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.70 vs. WMMCX (-32.77). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 56.35 vs. WMMCX (-36.54).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.296 | -16.273 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 183M | 78,142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.70 | -32.77 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.18 | -46.29 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.35 | -36.54 | -154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.14 | -54.26 | -116% |