Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$115.32
Change+$0.75 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.35
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.54M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. WMMCX (201M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.28) vs WMMCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.40 vs. WMMCX (-19.63). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 61.97 vs. WMMCX (-29.85).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.351 | 3.879 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 201M | 76,119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.40 | -19.63 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | -26.20 | -133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.97 | -29.85 | -208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.02 | -42.67 | -241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement