Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$121.46
Change+$0.30 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$13.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.28M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. WMMCX (203M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.25) vs WMMCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). WMMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. NAESX (9.99). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 60.61 vs. WMMCX (-31.22).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.381 | 10.455 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154B | 203M | 75,862% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 10.55 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | -26.61 | -121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.61 | -31.22 | -194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.39 | -34.54 | -377% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement