Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$123.61
Change+$1.12 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.94
Change+$0.08 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.44M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. WMMCX (197M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.23) vs WMMCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). WMMCX (9.35) and NAESX (9.13) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 56.51 vs. WMMCX (-33.90).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.604 | 8.432 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 197M | 82,234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | 9.35 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.05 | -18.64 | -252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.51 | -33.90 | -167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.38 | -36.75 | -357% |