Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.35
Change-$0.18 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$11.50
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.27M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and WMMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. WMMCX (192M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.35) vs WMMCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.88 vs. WMMCX (-19.74). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.45 vs. WMMCX (-38.80).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.929 | -2.951 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 192M | 77,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.88 | -19.74 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.26 | -35.95 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.45 | -38.80 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.90 | -46.29 | -207% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement