Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.67
Change+$0.22 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$9.97
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.29M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. WMMCX (179M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.22) vs WMMCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.55 vs. WMMCX (-18.06). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 39.03 vs. WMMCX (-52.59).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.25 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.218 | -15.852 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 179M | 90,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.55 | -18.06 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.75 | -44.03 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.03 | -52.59 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.66 | -51.13 | -238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement