Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.03
Change+$0.48 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.27B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$11.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.77M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. WMMCX (226M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.31) vs WMMCX (0.29). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (64 years) vs WMMCX (23 years). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.23 vs. WMMCX (-13.20). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.81 vs. WMMCX (-45.46).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.370 | 0.927 | 363% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155B | 226M | 68,584% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.29 | 451% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.23 | -13.20 | -161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.16 | -40.01 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.81 | -45.46 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.44 | -41.84 | -302% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...