Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$120.30
Change-$1.38 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.37
Change-$0.10 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 167B vs. WMMCX (249M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.31) vs WMMCX (0.29). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (64 years) vs WMMCX (23 years). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.54 vs. WMMCX (-11.83). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 53.79 vs. WMMCX (-42.11).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.994 | -14.631 | -123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167B | 249M | 67,068% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.29 | 451% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.54 | -11.83 | -165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.71 | -38.31 | -41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.79 | -42.11 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.30 | -41.12 | -302% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...