Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WMMCX
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$114.78
Change-$3.10 (-2.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.88B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$11.84
Change-$0.23 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.02M
NAESX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. WMMCX (214M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: NAESX (1.31) vs WMMCX (0.29). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: NAESX (64 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). WMMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.22 vs. WMMCX (-16.15). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 44.30 vs. WMMCX (-45.05).
| NAESX | WMMCX | NAESX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.321 | -0.169 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 214M | 75,234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.29 | 451% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.22 | -16.15 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.76 | -37.15 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.30 | -45.05 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.17 | -44.07 | -239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...