Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WWSCX
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WWSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.83
Change+$0.56 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
TETON Westwood SmallCap Equity C
Price$15.61
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.48M
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WWSCX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. WWSCX (64.5M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: NAESX (1.35) vs WWSCX (0.06). NAESX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WWSCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.84 vs. WWSCX (-17.65). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 60.15 vs. WWSCX (32.24).
| NAESX | WWSCX | NAESX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.00 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.33 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.155 | -7.915 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 64.5M | 229,457% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.06 | 2,446% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.84 | -17.65 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.88 | -5.19 | -672% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.15 | 32.24 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.64 | -16.92 | -541% |