Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WWSCX
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WWSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.04
Change+$1.67 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
TETON Westwood SmallCap Equity C
Price$15.03
Change+$0.32 (+2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.82M
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WWSCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WWSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. WWSCX (62.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: NAESX (1.43) vs WWSCX (0.06). NAESX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WWSCX (23 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WWSCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. WWSCX (-24.18). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.08 vs. WWSCX (33.70).
| NAESX | WWSCX | NAESX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.00 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.33 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.414 | -13.113 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 62.8M | 222,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.06 | 2,466% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | -24.18 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.27 | -15.80 | -128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.08 | 33.70 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.81 | -19.52 | -450% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...