Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WWSCX
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WWSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$99.26
Change+$0.85 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
TETON Westwood SmallCap Equity C
Price$13.91
Change+$0.09 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.02M
NAESX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WWSCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WWSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. WWSCX (60M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: NAESX (1.39) vs WWSCX (0.06). NAESX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WWSCX (23 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WWSCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. WWSCX (-24.36). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.71 vs. WWSCX (34.90).
| NAESX | WWSCX | NAESX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.00 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.33 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.464 | -18.370 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 60M | 238,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.06 | 2,507% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.42 | -24.36 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.49 | -27.13 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.71 | 34.90 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.20 | -25.20 | -290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...