It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NAII’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNAX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NAII’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNAX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NAII (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while SNAX (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -12.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.81%.
NAII is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
SNAX is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2023.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
NAII | SNAX | NAII / SNAX | |
Capitalization | 37.1M | 2.91M | 1,274% |
EBITDA | 272K | -13.01M | -2% |
Gain YTD | -34.916 | -75.083 | 47% |
P/E Ratio | 49.23 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 128M | 20.2M | 634% |
Total Cash | 16.6M | 226K | 7,345% |
Total Debt | 57.3M | 22.9M | 250% |
NAII | SNAX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 95 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNAX's Valuation (69) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NAII (81) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SNAX’s stock grew similarly to NAII’s over the last 12 months.
SNAX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NAII (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SNAX’s stock grew similarly to NAII’s over the last 12 months.
NAII's SMR Rating (92) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SNAX (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NAII’s stock grew similarly to SNAX’s over the last 12 months.
NAII's Price Growth Rating (85) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SNAX (95) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NAII’s stock grew similarly to SNAX’s over the last 12 months.
NAII's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNAX (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NAII’s stock grew significantly faster than SNAX’s over the last 12 months.
NAII | SNAX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago73% | 20 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 6 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NAII and RKDA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAII and RKDA's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NAII | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NAII | 100% | -0.70% | ||
RKDA - NAII | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.84% | ||
SNAX - NAII | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.31% | ||
BRFS - NAII | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
FAMI - NAII | 21% Poorly correlated | +7.39% | ||
DTEAF - NAII | 20% Poorly correlated | +12.61% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNAX and NAII have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNAX and NAII's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SNAX | 100% | -3.31% | ||
NAII - SNAX | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
WWNTF - SNAX | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
STKL - SNAX | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
TATYY - SNAX | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
DAR - SNAX | 20% Poorly correlated | +4.19% | ||
More |