Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAINX vs RLBEX
NAINX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts NAINX vs RLBEX
Virtus Tactical Allocation A
Price$11.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets637.67M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.93
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
NAINX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAINX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAINX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. NAINX (638M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than NAINX: RLBEX (1.79) vs NAINX (1.64). NAINX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: NAINX (85 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). NAINX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAINX (37.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAINX: RLBEX (250) vs NAINX (2500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. NAINX (-1.77). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. NAINX (-0.91).
| NAINX | RLBEX | NAINX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.59 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.59 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 85 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.627 | 11.352 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 638M | 259B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 1.79 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.77 | 9.94 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.25 | 39.85 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.91 | 39.68 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.96 | 77.45 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement