Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAINX vs RLBEX
NAINX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts NAINX vs RLBEX
Virtus Tactical Allocation A
Price$10.96
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets609.04M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.74
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
NAINX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAINX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAINX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. NAINX (609M). RLBEX (1.71) and NAINX (1.69) have matching dividends . NAINX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: NAINX (85 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). NAINX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAINX (37.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAINX: RLBEX (250) vs NAINX (2500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. NAINX (-7.12). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.72 vs. NAINX (-9.85).
| NAINX | RLBEX | NAINX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.59 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.59 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 85 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.962 | 14.042 | 35% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 609M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.71 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.12 | 8.98 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.41 | 41.02 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.85 | 38.72 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.56 | 73.32 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement