Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAINX vs RLBFX
NAINX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts NAINX vs RLBFX
Virtus Tactical Allocation A
Price$11.23
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets640.37M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.52
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
NAINX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAINX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAINX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. NAINX (640M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than NAINX: RLBFX (2.08) vs NAINX (1.64). NAINX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: NAINX (85 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). NAINX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAINX (37.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAINX: RLBFX (250) vs NAINX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. NAINX (-1.10). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.76 vs. NAINX (0.33).
| NAINX | RLBFX | NAINX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.29 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.29 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 85 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.340 | 9.922 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 640M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 2.08 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.10 | 8.29 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.40 | 30.56 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.33 | 39.76 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.84 | 69.21 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement