NAPRF
Price
$336.86
Change
+$9.16 (+2.80%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
51.35B
PROSF
Price
$61.04
Change
+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
136.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAPRF vs PROSF

Header iconNAPRF vs PROSF Comparison
Open Charts NAPRF vs PROSFBanner chart's image
Naspers
Price$336.86
Change+$9.16 (+2.80%)
Volume$45
Capitalization51.35B
Prosus
Price$61.04
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Volume$1.09K
Capitalization136.71B
NAPRF vs PROSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NAPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PROSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAPRF vs. PROSF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAPRF is a StrongBuy and PROSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (NAPRF: $336.86 vs. PROSF: $61.04)
Brand notoriety: NAPRF and PROSF are both not notable
NAPRF represents the Internet Retail, while PROSF is part of the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAPRF: 127% vs. PROSF: 54%
Market capitalization -- NAPRF: $51.35B vs. PROSF: $136.71B
NAPRF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $51.35B. PROSF’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $136.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.47T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $2.56T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $50.25B. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $76.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAPRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePROSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NAPRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PROSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAPRF is a better buy in the long-term than PROSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAPRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PROSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAPRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PROSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAPRF is a better buy in the short-term than PROSF.

Price Growth

NAPRF (@Internet Retail) experienced а +7.62% price change this week, while PROSF (@Internet Software/Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +9.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +250.29%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +4.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+9.43% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

@Internet Software/Services (+4.63% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PROSF($137B) has a higher market cap than NAPRF($51.3B). PROSF has higher P/E ratio than NAPRF: PROSF (11.83) vs NAPRF (11.20). NAPRF YTD gains are higher at: 56.250 vs. PROSF (45.578). PROSF (8.69B) and NAPRF (8.64B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . NAPRF (18.4B) and PROSF (18.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PROSF (16.6B) and NAPRF (16.9B) have identical debt. NAPRF has higher revenues than PROSF: NAPRF (6.87B) vs PROSF (5.87B).
NAPRFPROSFNAPRF / PROSF
Capitalization51.3B137B37%
EBITDA8.64B8.69B99%
Gain YTD56.25045.578123%
P/E Ratio11.2011.8395%
Revenue6.87B5.87B117%
Total Cash18.4B18.3B101%
Total Debt16.9B16.6B102%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAPRF vs PROSF: Fundamental Ratings
NAPRF
PROSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3533
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
372
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a1

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PROSF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as NAPRF (44). This means that PROSF’s stock grew similarly to NAPRF’s over the last 12 months.

NAPRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PROSF (72). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew significantly faster than PROSF’s over the last 12 months.

NAPRF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PROSF (100). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew similarly to PROSF’s over the last 12 months.

NAPRF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PROSF (41). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew similarly to PROSF’s over the last 12 months.

NAPRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PROSF (100). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew similarly to PROSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAPRFPROSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PROSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NTRB6.530.12
+1.87%
Nutriband
SD11.870.18
+1.54%
SandRidge Energy
NDRA4.140.03
+0.73%
ENDRA Life Sciences Inc
OI13.03-0.02
-0.15%
O-I Glass
WTRG39.66-0.17
-0.43%
Essential Utilities

NAPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAPRF and TCTZF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAPRF and TCTZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAPRF
1D Price
Change %
NAPRF100%
N/A
TCTZF - NAPRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
TCEHY - NAPRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
RCRUY - NAPRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
ONFO - NAPRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
PROSY - NAPRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More

PROSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PROSF has been loosely correlated with TCEHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PROSF jumps, then TCEHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PROSF
1D Price
Change %
PROSF100%
N/A
TCEHY - PROSF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
NAPRF - PROSF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TCTZF - PROSF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
ATHM - PROSF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
BIDU - PROSF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More