Advertisement
NAPRF vs TCTZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAPRF is a Hold and TCTZF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NAPRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTCTZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NAPRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TCTZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NAPRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCTZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NAPRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TCTZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
NAPRF (@Internet Retail) experienced а -1.49% price change this week, while TCTZF (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.13%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
TCTZF is expected to report earnings on Apr 08, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Retail (+2.54% weekly)The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.
@Internet Software/Services (+3.80% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| NAPRF | TCTZF | NAPRF / TCTZF | |
| Capitalization | 48.6B | 434B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 8.64B | 230B | 4% |
| Gain YTD | 42.258 | 24.201 | 175% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.19 | 16.42 | 62% |
| Revenue | 6.87B | 569B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 18.4B | 339B | 5% |
| Total Debt | 16.9B | 362B | 5% |
NAPRF | TCTZF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TCTZF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as NAPRF (38). This means that TCTZF’s stock grew similarly to NAPRF’s over the last 12 months.
NAPRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCTZF (81). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew significantly faster than TCTZF’s over the last 12 months.
NAPRF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCTZF (48). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCTZF’s over the last 12 months.
NAPRF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as TCTZF (51). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew similarly to TCTZF’s over the last 12 months.
NAPRF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as TCTZF (83). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew similarly to TCTZF’s over the last 12 months.
| NAPRF | TCTZF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
NAPRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NAPRF and TCTZF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAPRF and TCTZF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NAPRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAPRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TCTZF - NAPRF | 27% Poorly correlated | +4.91% | ||
| TCEHY - NAPRF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| RCRUY - NAPRF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
| ONFO - NAPRF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.88% | ||
| PROSY - NAPRF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||
TCTZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCTZF has been closely correlated with TCEHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TCTZF jumps, then TCEHY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCTZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCTZF | 100% | +4.91% | ||
| TCEHY - TCTZF | 81% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| PROSY - TCTZF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| NPSNY - TCTZF | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| BIDU - TCTZF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| WB - TCTZF | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||