It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NATR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRELV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NATR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
NATR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +15.52% price change this week, while RELV (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.25%.
NATR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
RELV is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
NATR | RELV | NATR / RELV | |
Capitalization | 392M | 6.72M | 5,830% |
EBITDA | 32.1M | 628K | 5,111% |
Gain YTD | -1.501 | -23.469 | 6% |
P/E Ratio | 27.06 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 445M | 35.1M | 1,268% |
Total Cash | 82.4M | 3.34M | 2,467% |
Total Debt | 14.9M | 1.63M | 913% |
NATR | RELV | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 44 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RELV's Valuation (70) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as NATR (79). This means that RELV’s stock grew similarly to NATR’s over the last 12 months.
NATR's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RELV (92). This means that NATR’s stock grew somewhat faster than RELV’s over the last 12 months.
RELV's SMR Rating (9) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for NATR (80). This means that RELV’s stock grew significantly faster than NATR’s over the last 12 months.
RELV's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as NATR (49). This means that RELV’s stock grew similarly to NATR’s over the last 12 months.
NATR's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RELV (24). This means that NATR’s stock grew similarly to RELV’s over the last 12 months.
NATR | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NATR and USNA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NATR and USNA's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NATR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NATR | 100% | +4.64% | ||
USNA - NATR | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.76% | ||
CENTA - NATR | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.10% | ||
BGS - NATR | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
LANC - NATR | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
JBSS - NATR | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.71% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RELV and JJSF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RELV and JJSF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RELV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RELV | 100% | N/A | ||
JJSF - RELV | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
MDLZ - RELV | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
NAII - RELV | 3% Poorly correlated | +12.94% | ||
HSY - RELV | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
NATR - RELV | -1% Poorly correlated | +4.15% | ||
More |