It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NAVI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWLFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NAVI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
NAVI (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.05% price change this week, while WLFC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -8.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.38%.
NAVI is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
WLFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2024.
A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
NAVI | WLFC | NAVI / WLFC | |
Capitalization | 1.92B | 317M | 606% |
EBITDA | N/A | 237M | - |
Gain YTD | -15.498 | 316.897 | -5% |
P/E Ratio | 9.21 | 7.86 | 117% |
Revenue | 1.28B | 419M | 305% |
Total Cash | N/A | 7.07M | - |
Total Debt | 57.3B | 1.8B | 3,178% |
NAVI | WLFC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NAVI's Valuation (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLFC (81). This means that NAVI’s stock grew significantly faster than WLFC’s over the last 12 months.
WLFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAVI (50). This means that WLFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAVI’s over the last 12 months.
NAVI's SMR Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLFC (87). This means that NAVI’s stock grew significantly faster than WLFC’s over the last 12 months.
WLFC's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as NAVI (56). This means that WLFC’s stock grew similarly to NAVI’s over the last 12 months.
NAVI's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WLFC (11). This means that NAVI’s stock grew similarly to WLFC’s over the last 12 months.
NAVI | WLFC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 8 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago61% | 1 day ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago46% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLFC has been loosely correlated with NNI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLFC jumps, then NNI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WLFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WLFC | 100% | -2.08% | ||
NNI - WLFC | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
SYF - WLFC | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
AL - WLFC | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
ATLC - WLFC | 34% Loosely correlated | +4.09% | ||
NAVI - WLFC | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
More |