Ad is loading...
NBGTX vs RGACX
NBGTX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$29.41
Change-$0.58 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$74.17
Change-$1.79 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
NBGTX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGACX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. NBGTX (2.59B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGACX (0.25) vs NBGTX (0.07). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (31.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NBGTX (0) vs RGACX (250). NBGTX (11.99) and RGACX (11.75) have marching annual gain over last year. NBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.56 vs. RGACX (40.11).
| NBGTX | RGACX | NBGTX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.485 | 3.028 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 304B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.25 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 11.75 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.07 | 21.80 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.56 | 40.11 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.05 | 69.61 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...