Ad is loading...
NBGTX vs RGACX
NBGTX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$25.56
Change-$1.40 (-5.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$64.60
Change-$3.86 (-5.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
NBGTX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. NBGTX (2.27B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGACX (0.09) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NBGTX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.32 vs. NBGTX (-0.37). NBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 75.01 vs. RGACX (68.49).
| NBGTX | RGACX | NBGTX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.970 | -4.903 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 280B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | -0.32 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.71 | 4.15 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.01 | 68.49 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.81 | 57.41 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...