Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGTX vs RGACX
NBGTX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$32.98
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
NBGTX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NBGTX (2.67B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGACX (0.07) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NBGTX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.97 vs. NBGTX (14.06). NBGTX (48.30) and RGACX (46.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBGTX | RGACX | NBGTX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.906 | 18.419 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 340B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.06 | 16.97 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.98 | 61.65 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.30 | 46.16 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.17 | 100.90 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers