Ad is loading...
NBGTX vs RGAFX
NBGTX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGAFX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$28.04
Change+$0.46 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$72.98
Change+$1.55 (+2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.28B
NBGTX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGAFX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 281B vs. NBGTX (2.3B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGAFX (0.65) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: NBGTX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. NBGTX (5.63). NBGTX (54.60) and RGAFX (53.65) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBGTX | RGAFX | NBGTX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.34 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.34 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.831 | -1.935 | 250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 281B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 7.15 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.92 | 24.85 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.60 | 53.65 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.07 | 65.94 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...