Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGTX vs RGAFX
NBGTX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGAFX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$31.13
Change+$0.36 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$82.84
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.78B
NBGTX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a Buy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 320B vs. NBGTX (2.53B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGAFX (0.57) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: NBGTX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.20 vs. NBGTX (7.29). NBGTX (51.40) and RGAFX (51.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBGTX | RGAFX | NBGTX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.34 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.34 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.177 | 11.314 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 320B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.29 | 11.20 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.71 | 60.78 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.40 | 51.12 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.49 | 88.74 | 52% |