Ad is loading...
NBGTX vs RGAFX
NBGTX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NBGTX vs RGAFX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$25.56
Change-$1.40 (-5.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$66.89
Change-$3.98 (-5.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
NBGTX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGTX vs. RGAFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGTX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. NBGTX (2.27B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: RGAFX (0.66) vs NBGTX (0.00). NBGTX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NBGTX (32 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: NBGTX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.51 vs. NBGTX (-0.37). NBGTX (75.01) and RGAFX (73.14) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBGTX | RGAFX | NBGTX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.34 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.34 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.970 | -4.770 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 280B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.66 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | 0.51 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.71 | 5.94 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.01 | 73.14 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.81 | 62.64 | 40% |