Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGUX vs RGACX
NBGUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NBGUX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Adv
Price$32.40
Change+$0.27 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.66B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.09
Change+$0.64 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
NBGUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGUX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGUX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. NBGUX (2.66B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NBGUX: RGACX (0.07) vs NBGUX (0.00). NBGUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NBGUX (29 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NBGUX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NBGUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NBGUX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NBGUX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.19 vs. NBGUX (11.18). RGACX (40.04) and NBGUX (38.19) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBGUX | RGACX | NBGUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.94 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.94 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.574 | 19.586 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.66B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 14.19 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.52 | 74.27 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.19 | 40.04 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.99 | 101.32 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement