Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGUX vs RGACX
NBGUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NBGUX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Adv
Price$33.12
Change+$0.60 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.77
Change+$1.67 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.42B
NBGUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGUX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGUX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 331B vs. NBGUX (2.59B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NBGUX: RGACX (0.07) vs NBGUX (0.00). NBGUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NBGUX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NBGUX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NBGUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NBGUX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NBGUX (0) vs RGACX (250). NBGUX (6.42) and RGACX (6.21) have marching annual gain over last year. NBGUX (30.09) and RGACX (29.81) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBGUX | RGACX | NBGUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.94 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.94 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.009 | 16.363 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 331B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.42 | 6.21 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.05 | 60.61 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.09 | 29.81 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.84 | 86.59 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement