Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHCX vs VIVAX
NBHCX vs VIVAX Comparison
Open Charts NBHCX vs VIVAX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
Price$15.17
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets985.54M
NBHCX vs VIVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHCX vs. VIVAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHCX is a Buy and VIVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIVAX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. NBHCX (986M). VIVAX pays higher dividends than NBHCX: VIVAX (1.97) vs NBHCX (0.92). NBHCX was incepted earlier than VIVAX: NBHCX (17 years) vs VIVAX (33 years). NBHCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than VIVAX (0.17). NBHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VIVAX (9.00). NBHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIVAX: NBHCX (1000) vs VIVAX (3000). NBHCX (8.51) and VIVAX (8.19) have marching annual gain over last year. VIVAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.42 vs. NBHCX (27.82).
| NBHCX | VIVAX | NBHCX / VIVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.885 | 10.738 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 986M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.97 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.51 | 8.19 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.70 | 49.08 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.82 | 73.42 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.86 | 132.94 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement