Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHCX vs VIVAX
NBHCX vs VIVAX Comparison
Open Charts NBHCX vs VIVAX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
Price$14.67
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets965.78M
Vanguard Value Index I
Price$69.58
Change-$0.43 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.18B
NBHCX vs VIVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHCX vs. VIVAX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHCX is a Buy and VIVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIVAX has more cash in the bank: 195B vs. NBHCX (966M). VIVAX pays higher dividends than NBHCX: VIVAX (2.06) vs NBHCX (1.00). NBHCX was incepted earlier than VIVAX: NBHCX (17 years) vs VIVAX (33 years). NBHCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than VIVAX (0.17). NBHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VIVAX (9.00). NBHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIVAX: NBHCX (1000) vs VIVAX (3000). VIVAX (9.92) and NBHCX (9.59) have marching annual gain over last year. VIVAX return over 5 years is better than : 79.51 vs. NBHCX (34.50).
| NBHCX | VIVAX | NBHCX / VIVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.740 | 6.027 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 966M | 195B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 2.06 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.59 | 9.92 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.62 | 36.58 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.50 | 79.51 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.95 | 111.54 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement