Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHCX vs VIVAX
NBHCX vs VIVAX Comparison
Open Charts NBHCX vs VIVAX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
Price$14.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets962.45M
Vanguard Value Index I
Price$71.47
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.81B
NBHCX vs VIVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHCX vs. VIVAX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHCX is a Buy and VIVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIVAX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. NBHCX (962M). VIVAX pays higher dividends than NBHCX: VIVAX (1.99) vs NBHCX (0.99). NBHCX was incepted earlier than VIVAX: NBHCX (17 years) vs VIVAX (33 years). NBHCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than VIVAX (0.17). NBHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VIVAX (9.00). NBHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIVAX: NBHCX (1000) vs VIVAX (3000). VIVAX (7.13) and NBHCX (6.93) have marching annual gain over last year. VIVAX return over 5 years is better than : 69.23 vs. NBHCX (25.44).
| NBHCX | VIVAX | NBHCX / VIVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.804 | 8.238 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 962M | 196B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.99 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 7.13 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.35 | 35.06 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.44 | 69.23 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.21 | 138.92 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement