Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHCX vs VIVAX
NBHCX vs VIVAX Comparison
Open Charts NBHCX vs VIVAX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
Price$14.39
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets933.76M
Vanguard Value Index I
Price$67.51
Change+$0.65 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets188.77B
NBHCX vs VIVAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHCX vs. VIVAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHCX is a Buy and VIVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIVAX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. NBHCX (934M). VIVAX pays higher dividends than NBHCX: VIVAX (2.16) vs NBHCX (0.95). NBHCX was incepted earlier than VIVAX: NBHCX (17 years) vs VIVAX (33 years). NBHCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than VIVAX (0.17). NBHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VIVAX (9.00). NBHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIVAX: NBHCX (1000) vs VIVAX (3000). NBHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. VIVAX (6.81). VIVAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.70 vs. NBHCX (26.60).
| NBHCX | VIVAX | NBHCX / VIVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.17 | 1,082% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.557 | 1.238 | 691% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 934M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 2.16 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 6.81 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.82 | 18.51 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.60 | 58.70 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.80 | 102.90 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement