Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBIAX vs RLBEX
NBIAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts NBIAX vs RLBEX
Columbia Capital Alloc Mod Agrsv A
Price$12.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.45
Change-$0.11 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
NBIAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBIAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBIAX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. NBIAX (1.78B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than NBIAX: RLBEX (1.79) vs NBIAX (1.56). NBIAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: NBIAX (29 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). NBIAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NBIAX (8.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBIAX: RLBEX (250) vs NBIAX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. NBIAX (7.09). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.83 vs. NBIAX (17.37).
| NBIAX | RLBEX | NBIAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.59 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.59 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.163 | 12.878 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.79 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.09 | 9.28 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.05 | 42.83 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.37 | 42.83 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.98 | 81.02 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement