Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBIAX vs RLBFX
NBIAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts NBIAX vs RLBFX
Columbia Capital Alloc Mod Agrsv A
Price$12.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.71B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.76
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.58B
NBIAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBIAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBIAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. NBIAX (1.71B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than NBIAX: RLBFX (2.10) vs NBIAX (1.62). NBIAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: NBIAX (29 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). NBIAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NBIAX (8.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBIAX: RLBFX (250) vs NBIAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. NBIAX (4.24). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.55 vs. NBIAX (15.58).
| NBIAX | RLBFX | NBIAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.29 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.29 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.703 | 7.695 | 48% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 251B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.24 | 8.24 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.43 | 35.47 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.58 | 42.55 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.55 | 67.06 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement