Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBIAX vs RLBFX
NBIAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts NBIAX vs RLBFX
Columbia Capital Alloc Mod Agrsv A
Price$12.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.58
Change-$0.11 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
NBIAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBIAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBIAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. NBIAX (1.78B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than NBIAX: RLBFX (2.05) vs NBIAX (1.56). NBIAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: NBIAX (29 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). NBIAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NBIAX (8.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBIAX: RLBFX (250) vs NBIAX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. NBIAX (7.09). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.60 vs. NBIAX (17.37).
| NBIAX | RLBFX | NBIAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.29 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.29 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.163 | 13.027 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 2.05 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.09 | 9.55 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.05 | 43.97 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.37 | 44.60 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.98 | 82.04 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement