NBMFF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
28.25M
OMHLF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.06 (-26.09%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
268.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBMFF vs OMHLF

Header iconNBMFF vs OMHLF Comparison
Open Charts NBMFF vs OMHLFBanner chart's image
NEO Battery Materials
Price$0.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.11K
Capitalization28.25M
OM Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.06 (-26.09%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization268.11M
NBMFF vs OMHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBMFF vs. OMHLF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMFF is a Hold and OMHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (NBMFF: $0.37 vs. OMHLF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: NBMFF and OMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBMFF: 294% vs. OMHLF: 7%
Market capitalization -- NBMFF: $28.25M vs. OMHLF: $268.11M
NBMFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $28.25M. OMHLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $268.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBMFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NBMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMHLF is a better buy in the long-term than NBMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBMFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMHLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBMFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OMHLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMHLF is a better buy in the short-term than NBMFF.

Price Growth

NBMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.50% price change this week, while OMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMHLF($268M) has a higher market cap than NBMFF($28.2M). OMHLF YTD gains are higher at: -27.127 vs. NBMFF (-32.727). OMHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 191M vs. NBMFF (-1.95M). OMHLF has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. NBMFF (1.09M). NBMFF has less debt than OMHLF: NBMFF (0) vs OMHLF (417M). OMHLF has higher revenues than NBMFF: OMHLF (883M) vs NBMFF (0).
NBMFFOMHLFNBMFF / OMHLF
Capitalization28.2M268M11%
EBITDA-1.95M191M-1%
Gain YTD-32.727-27.127121%
P/E RatioN/A4.42-
Revenue0883M-
Total Cash1.09M112M1%
Total Debt0417M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBMFF: Fundamental Ratings
NBMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBMFFOMHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRCPX58.37N/A
N/A
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec A
CBEJX11.09N/A
N/A
Allspring Large Cap Value CL R6
FSWCX12.86N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI US Value Index
FGFLX43.52N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders IS
VIKSX11.24N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth I

NBMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBMFF and ASHXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBMFF and ASHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBMFF
1D Price
Change %
NBMFF100%
N/A
ASHXF - NBMFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLTLF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
ECRAF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMC - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMHLF - NBMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMHLF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMHLF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMHLF
1D Price
Change %
OMHLF100%
N/A
CASXF - OMHLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATCUF - OMHLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRHYY - OMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGHPF - OMHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNCJF - OMHLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
More