NBMFF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
28.25M
RECHF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBMFF vs RECHF

Header iconNBMFF vs RECHF Comparison
Open Charts NBMFF vs RECHFBanner chart's image
NEO Battery Materials
Price$0.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.11K
Capitalization28.25M
Vanguard Mng
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.66K
Capitalization13.6M
NBMFF vs RECHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RECHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBMFF vs. RECHF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMFF is a Hold and RECHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (NBMFF: $0.37 vs. RECHF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: NBMFF and RECHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBMFF: 294% vs. RECHF: 53%
Market capitalization -- NBMFF: $28.25M vs. RECHF: $13.6M
NBMFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $28.25M. RECHF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $13.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBMFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRECHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NBMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RECHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RECHF is a better buy in the long-term than NBMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBMFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RECHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBMFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RECHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NBMFF is a better buy in the short-term than RECHF.

Price Growth

NBMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.50% price change this week, while RECHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMFF($28.2M) has a higher market cap than RECHF($13.6M). RECHF YTD gains are higher at: 207.578 vs. NBMFF (-32.727). NBMFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.95M vs. RECHF (-10.26M). NBMFF has more cash in the bank: 1.09M vs. RECHF (778K). NBMFF has less debt than RECHF: NBMFF (0) vs RECHF (229K). NBMFF (0) and RECHF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NBMFFRECHFNBMFF / RECHF
Capitalization28.2M13.6M207%
EBITDA-1.95M-10.26M19%
Gain YTD-32.727207.578-16%
P/E RatioN/A0.20-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.09M778K140%
Total Debt0229K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBMFF vs RECHF: Fundamental Ratings
NBMFF
RECHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
282
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10065
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RECHF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBMFF (88). This means that RECHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as RECHF (100). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to RECHF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as RECHF (99). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to RECHF’s over the last 12 months.

RECHF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NBMFF (39). This means that RECHF’s stock grew similarly to NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

RECHF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBMFF (100). This means that RECHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBMFFRECHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RECHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REDLF0.240.01
+2.35%
VAULT MINERALS LTD
NPPTF1.040.01
+0.97%
Neptune Digital Assets Corp.
ACKAY15.86N/A
N/A
Arcelik A.S.
SWGNF35.78N/A
N/A
Swatch Group AG
MSEZ0.06N/A
N/A
Media Sentiment, Inc.

NBMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBMFF and ASHXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBMFF and ASHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBMFF
1D Price
Change %
NBMFF100%
N/A
ASHXF - NBMFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLTLF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
ECRAF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMC - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMHLF - NBMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RECHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RECHF and PNPNF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RECHF and PNPNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RECHF
1D Price
Change %
RECHF100%
+1.15%
PNPNF - RECHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
NBMFF - RECHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRSLF - RECHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IONR - RECHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
LBNKF - RECHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More