NBMFF
Price
$0.40
Change
-$0.02 (-4.76%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
49M
VLTLF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.03 (+21.43%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
28.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NBMFF vs VLTLF

Header iconNBMFF vs VLTLF Comparison
Open Charts NBMFF vs VLTLFBanner chart's image
NEO Battery Materials
Price$0.40
Change-$0.02 (-4.76%)
Volume$10.9K
Capitalization49M
LibertyStream Infrastructure Partners
Price$0.17
Change+$0.03 (+21.43%)
Volume$568.49K
Capitalization28.74M
NBMFF vs VLTLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NBMFF vs. VLTLF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMFF is a Hold and VLTLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (NBMFF: $0.40 vs. VLTLF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: NBMFF and VLTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NBMFF: 77% vs. VLTLF: 345%
Market capitalization -- NBMFF: $49M vs. VLTLF: $28.74M
NBMFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $49M. VLTLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $28.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NBMFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NBMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLTLF is a better buy in the long-term than NBMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NBMFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLTLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NBMFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VLTLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLTLF is a better buy in the short-term than NBMFF.

Price Growth

NBMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.67% price change this week, while VLTLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +31.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMFF($49M) has a higher market cap than VLTLF($28.7M). VLTLF YTD gains are higher at: -16.125 vs. NBMFF (-27.273). NBMFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.27M vs. VLTLF (-4.55M). VLTLF has more cash in the bank: 1.77M vs. NBMFF (63.8K). NBMFF has less debt than VLTLF: NBMFF (156K) vs VLTLF (320K). NBMFF (0) and VLTLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NBMFFVLTLFNBMFF / VLTLF
Capitalization49M28.7M171%
EBITDA-4.27M-4.55M94%
Gain YTD-27.273-16.125169%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash63.8K1.77M4%
Total Debt156K320K49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NBMFF vs VLTLF: Fundamental Ratings
NBMFF
VLTLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8910
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3892
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10025
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLTLF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBMFF (93). This means that VLTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as VLTLF (100). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to VLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

VLTLF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as NBMFF (100). This means that VLTLF’s stock grew similarly to NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLTLF (92). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

VLTLF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBMFF (100). This means that VLTLF’s stock grew significantly faster than NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NBMFFVLTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THSGF1.130.05
+4.22%
THESIS GOLD INC.
SOHVY5.86N/A
N/A
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Co.
PNBI29.06N/A
N/A
Pioneer Bankshares, Inc.
CXMSF0.90N/A
N/A
Cemex S.A.B de C.V.
NDATF0.01N/A
N/A
NDATALYZE CORP.

NBMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBMFF and ASHXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBMFF and ASHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBMFF
1D Price
Change %
NBMFF100%
-5.30%
ASHXF - NBMFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLTLF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+22.49%
ECRAF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
AUMC - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
OMHLF - NBMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VLTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLTLF and AVLNF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLTLF and AVLNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLTLF
1D Price
Change %
VLTLF100%
+22.49%
AVLNF - VLTLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.86%
NBMFF - VLTLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.30%
PWRMF - VLTLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.74%
EVKRF - VLTLF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
FCLIF - VLTLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More