Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBMRX vs VEVYX
NBMRX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts NBMRX vs VEVYX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$28.27
Change-$0.27 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.78M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.64
Change-$0.33 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.09B
NBMRX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBMRX vs. VEVYX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMRX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. NBMRX (52.8M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: VEVYX (1.02) vs NBMRX (0.75). NBMRX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: NBMRX (7 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: NBMRX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.37 vs. VEVYX (-8.40). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 81.19 vs. VEVYX (34.59).
| NBMRX | VEVYX | NBMRX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.66 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.66 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.765 | 3.010 | 291% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.8M | 17.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.02 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.37 | -8.40 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.38 | 12.37 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.19 | 34.59 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement