Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBMRX vs VEVYX
NBMRX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts NBMRX vs VEVYX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$25.15
Change+$0.15 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.66M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$45.08
Change+$0.41 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.16B
NBMRX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBMRX vs. VEVYX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMRX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.2B vs. NBMRX (49.7M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: VEVYX (1.12) vs NBMRX (0.85). NBMRX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: NBMRX (6 years) vs VEVYX (12 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: NBMRX (0) vs VEVYX (1000000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.14 vs. VEVYX (-7.25). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 54.65 vs. VEVYX (29.06).
| NBMRX | VEVYX | NBMRX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.66 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.66 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.726 | -2.585 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.7M | 17.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.12 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.14 | -7.25 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.60 | -5.90 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.65 | 29.06 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement