Ad is loading...
NBMVX vs VISGX
NBMVX vs VISGX Comparison
Open Charts NBMVX vs VISGX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Adv
Price$44.33
Change+$0.43 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets420.59M
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index I
Price$72.41
Change+$1.09 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.98B
NBMVX vs VISGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBMVX vs. VISGX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMVX is a Buy and VISGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VISGX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. NBMVX (421M). VISGX pays higher dividends than NBMVX: VISGX (0.47) vs NBMVX (0.00). NBMVX was incepted earlier than VISGX: NBMVX (23 years) vs VISGX (27 years). NBMVX (1.68) is less costly to investors than VISGX (0.19). NBMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. VISGX (21.00). NBMVX has a lower initial minimum investment than VISGX: NBMVX (0) vs VISGX (3000). VISGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.78 vs. NBMVX (-0.50). VISGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.60 vs. NBMVX (16.50).
| NBMVX | VISGX | NBMVX / VISGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.19 | 847% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.19 | 884% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.463 | -9.372 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 421M | 33B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.50 | 1.78 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.54 | 26.33 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.50 | 39.60 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.02 | 94.96 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...