Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBMVX vs WCMLX
NBMVX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBMVX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Adv
Price$52.06
Change+$0.51 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets505.52M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
NBMVX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBMVX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBMVX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMVX has more cash in the bank: 506M vs. WCMLX (41.1M). NBMVX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NBMVX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBMVX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBMVX (1.68). NBMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NBMVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NBMVX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). NBMVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.96 vs. WCMLX (-2.18). NBMVX return over 5 years is better than : 2.65 vs. WCMLX (-0.99).
| NBMVX | WCMLX | NBMVX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.99 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.79 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.140 | 1.400 | 367% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 506M | 41.1M | 1,231% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.96 | -2.18 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.85 | 20.96 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.65 | -0.99 | -269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.31 | N/A | - |