Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNAX vs REREX
NBNAX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs REREX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$14.63
Change-$0.07 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.67M
American Funds EUPAC R4
Price$62.05
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.22B
NBNAX vs REREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. REREX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a Hold and REREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. NBNAX (236M). NBNAX pays higher dividends than REREX: NBNAX (0.80) vs REREX (0.66). NBNAX was incepted earlier than REREX: NBNAX (18 years) vs REREX (23 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REREX (35.00). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: REREX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). REREX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. NBNAX (10.29). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.08 vs. REREX (3.34).
| NBNAX | REREX | NBNAX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.82 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.82 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.777 | 18.620 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 236M | 132B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.66 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.29 | 12.86 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.06 | 30.98 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.08 | 3.34 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.44 | 37.71 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement