Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNAX vs REREX
NBNAX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs REREX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.45
Change+$0.17 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9M
American Funds EUPAC R4
Price$58.84
Change+$0.37 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.77B
NBNAX vs REREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. REREX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a Hold and REREX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. NBNAX (227M). REREX pays higher dividends than NBNAX: REREX (1.06) vs NBNAX (0.80). NBNAX was incepted earlier than REREX: NBNAX (18 years) vs REREX (23 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REREX (35.00). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: REREX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. REREX (6.18). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. REREX (19.09).
| NBNAX | REREX | NBNAX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.82 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.82 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.582 | 12.483 | 157% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.97 | 6.18 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 27.04 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.14 | 19.09 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.96 | 24.70 | 190% |