Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNCX vs REREX
NBNCX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs REREX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.16
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.67M
American Funds EUPAC R4
Price$62.05
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.22B
NBNCX vs REREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. REREX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a Hold and REREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. NBNCX (236M). REREX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: REREX (0.66) vs NBNCX (0.06). NBNCX was incepted earlier than REREX: NBNCX (18 years) vs REREX (23 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REREX (35.00). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: REREX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). REREX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. NBNCX (9.38). REREX return over 5 years is better than : 3.34 vs. NBNCX (0.70).
| NBNCX | REREX | NBNCX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.82 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.82 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.947 | 18.620 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 236M | 132B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.66 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.38 | 12.86 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.99 | 30.98 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.70 | 3.34 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.31 | 37.71 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement