Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNCX vs REREX
NBNCX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs REREX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.41
Change-$0.22 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.08M
American Funds EUPAC R4
Price$61.96
Change-$0.51 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.46B
NBNCX vs REREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. REREX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a Hold and REREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. NBNCX (246M). REREX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: REREX (0.70) vs NBNCX (0.06). NBNCX was incepted earlier than REREX: NBNCX (18 years) vs REREX (23 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REREX (35.00). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: REREX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). REREX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. NBNCX (5.63). REREX return over 5 years is better than : 15.75 vs. NBNCX (13.00).
| NBNCX | REREX | NBNCX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.82 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.82 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.203 | 18.448 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246M | 136B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.70 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 7.53 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.06 | 49.95 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.00 | 15.75 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.28 | 47.90 | 105% |