Ad is loading...
NBNCX vs REREX
NBNCX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs REREX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$12.93
Change+$0.34 (+2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.57M
American Funds Europacific Growth R4
Price$51.34
Change+$0.87 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.48B
NBNCX vs REREX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. REREX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a Hold and REREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. NBNCX (184M). REREX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: REREX (1.15) vs NBNCX (0.07). NBNCX was incepted earlier than REREX: NBNCX (17 years) vs REREX (23 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REREX (30.00). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: REREX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). NBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.26 vs. REREX (-8.62). REREX return over 5 years is better than : 21.59 vs. NBNCX (18.81).
| NBNCX | REREX | NBNCX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.82 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.82 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -1.854 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184M | 116B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.15 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.26 | -8.62 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.72 | -1.34 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.81 | 21.59 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.37 | 6.11 | 203% |