Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNCX vs RERFX
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$15.18
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.48M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$61.53
Change-$0.33 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.01B
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. RERFX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. NBNCX (261M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: RERFX (0.90) vs NBNCX (0.06). NBNCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNCX (18 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: RERFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). NBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.29 vs. RERFX (10.14). NBNCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.45 vs. RERFX (16.16).
| NBNCX | RERFX | NBNCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.52 | 367% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.52 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.969 | 14.666 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261M | 136B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.90 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.29 | 10.14 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.98 | 30.95 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.45 | 16.16 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.34 | 30.30 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers