Ad is loading...
NBNCX vs RERFX
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$13.36
Change+$0.12 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.48M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5
Price$56.69
Change+$0.48 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130B
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. RERFX commentary
Feb 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a StrongBuy and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. NBNCX (194M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: RERFX (1.79) vs NBNCX (0.73). NBNCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNCX (17 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RERFX (34.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: RERFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). NBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.94 vs. RERFX (5.38). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.88 vs. NBNCX (4.74).
| NBNCX | RERFX | NBNCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.163 | 5.647 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 194M | 130B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.79 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 5.38 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.29 | -2.07 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.74 | 10.88 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.87 | 25.47 | 102% |