Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNCX vs RERFX
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets220.07M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5
Price$59.72
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.57B
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. RERFX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a Buy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. NBNCX (220M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: RERFX (1.39) vs NBNCX (0.07). NBNCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNCX (17 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (30.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: RERFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). NBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.75 vs. RERFX (1.90). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.58 vs. NBNCX (29.54).
| NBNCX | RERFX | NBNCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.52 | 367% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.52 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.330 | 11.293 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.39 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.75 | 1.90 | 513% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.72 | 20.34 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.54 | 31.58 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.70 | 22.74 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement