Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNCX vs RERFX
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.16
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.67M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$63.87
Change-$0.26 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.22B
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. RERFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. NBNCX (236M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: RERFX (0.83) vs NBNCX (0.06). NBNCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNCX (18 years) vs RERFX (24 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: RERFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.37 vs. NBNCX (9.38). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.94 vs. NBNCX (0.70).
| NBNCX | RERFX | NBNCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.52 | 367% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.52 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.947 | 19.027 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 236M | 132B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.83 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.38 | 13.37 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.99 | 32.23 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.70 | 4.94 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.31 | 40.43 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement