Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNCX vs RERFX
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.70
Change-$0.07 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.01M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$65.35
Change-$0.27 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. RERFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. NBNCX (248M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: RERFX (0.85) vs NBNCX (0.06). NBNCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNCX (18 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: RERFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.91 vs. NBNCX (7.81). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.75 vs. NBNCX (9.73).
| NBNCX | RERFX | NBNCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.52 | 367% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.52 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.315 | 22.288 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 248M | 138B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.85 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.81 | 11.91 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.44 | 50.52 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.73 | 15.75 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.27 | 45.03 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement