Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNCX vs RERFX
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.62
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.32M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$62.25
Change+$0.32 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.86B
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. RERFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a StrongBuy and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. NBNCX (245M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: RERFX (0.88) vs NBNCX (0.06). NBNCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNCX (18 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: RERFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.00 vs. NBNCX (6.41). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. NBNCX (11.31).
| NBNCX | RERFX | NBNCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.52 | 367% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.52 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.124 | 16.008 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.88 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 9.00 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 36.35 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.31 | 13.04 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.36 | 41.90 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement