Ad is loading...
NBNCX vs RERFX
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$12.93
Change+$0.34 (+2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.57M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5
Price$52.71
Change+$0.89 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.48B
NBNCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNCX vs. RERFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNCX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. NBNCX (184M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: RERFX (1.43) vs NBNCX (0.07). NBNCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNCX (17 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (30.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: RERFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). NBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.26 vs. RERFX (-8.21). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.36 vs. NBNCX (18.81).
| NBNCX | RERFX | NBNCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.52 | 367% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.52 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -1.770 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184M | 116B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.43 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.26 | -8.21 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.72 | -0.47 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.81 | 23.36 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.37 | 8.13 | 152% |