Ad is loading...
NBNRX vs RERFX
NBNRX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNRX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel R3
Price$12.99
Change+$0.86 (+7.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.5M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5
Price$51.73
Change+$2.46 (+4.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.84B
NBNRX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNRX vs. RERFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNRX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. NBNRX (172M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNRX: RERFX (1.43) vs NBNRX (0.71). NBNRX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNRX (16 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNRX (1.61) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (30.00). NBNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERFX: NBNRX (0) vs RERFX (250). NBNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.64 vs. RERFX (-14.90). NBNRX (15.83) and RERFX (15.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBNRX | RERFX | NBNRX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.52 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.52 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.086 | -8.181 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.43 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.64 | -14.90 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.84 | -8.87 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.83 | 15.31 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.17 | 0.97 | 1,150% |