Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBRAX vs VEVYX
NBRAX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts NBRAX vs VEVYX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$27.36
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.66M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$45.08
Change+$0.06 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.88B
NBRAX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBRAX vs. VEVYX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBRAX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. NBRAX (48.7M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than NBRAX: VEVYX (1.05) vs NBRAX (0.35). NBRAX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: NBRAX (15 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). NBRAX (1.78) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NBRAX (29.00). NBRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: NBRAX (1000) vs VEVYX (1000000). NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.48 vs. VEVYX (-13.44). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.77 vs. VEVYX (18.53).
| NBRAX | VEVYX | NBRAX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.66 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.66 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.222 | -1.266 | -333% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7M | 15.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.05 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.48 | -13.44 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.37 | -2.83 | -473% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.77 | 18.53 | 279% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.14 | 42.71 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement