Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBRTX vs VEVYX
NBRTX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts NBRTX vs VEVYX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val Inst
Price$28.00
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.43M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.17B
NBRTX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBRTX vs. VEVYX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBRTX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.2B vs. NBRTX (52.4M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than NBRTX: VEVYX (1.06) vs NBRTX (0.69). NBRTX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: NBRTX (16 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). NBRTX (1.36) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NBRTX (29.00). NBRTX (1000000) and VEVYX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.78 vs. VEVYX (-8.72). NBRTX return over 5 years is better than : 81.51 vs. VEVYX (38.54).
| NBRTX | VEVYX | NBRTX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.66 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.66 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.593 | 2.550 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.4M | 17.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.06 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.78 | -8.72 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.84 | 6.72 | 325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.51 | 38.54 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.86 | 56.68 | 74% |