Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBRTX vs VEVYX
NBRTX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts NBRTX vs VEVYX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val Inst
Price$26.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.38M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$45.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.17B
NBRTX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBRTX vs. VEVYX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBRTX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.2B vs. NBRTX (50.4M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than NBRTX: VEVYX (1.08) vs NBRTX (0.72). NBRTX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: NBRTX (15 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). NBRTX (1.36) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NBRTX (29.00). NBRTX (1000000) and VEVYX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.54 vs. VEVYX (-4.73). NBRTX return over 5 years is better than : 66.98 vs. VEVYX (36.19).
| NBRTX | VEVYX | NBRTX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.66 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.66 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.572 | 0.585 | -98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.4M | 17.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.08 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.54 | -4.73 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.24 | 1.22 | 759% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.98 | 36.19 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.24 | 46.28 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement