Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBRTX vs VEVYX
NBRTX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts NBRTX vs VEVYX
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val Inst
Price$27.24
Change-$0.16 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.54M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$44.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.82B
NBRTX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBRTX vs. VEVYX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBRTX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. NBRTX (48.5M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than NBRTX: VEVYX (1.05) vs NBRTX (0.67). NBRTX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: NBRTX (16 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). NBRTX (1.36) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NBRTX (29.00). NBRTX (1000000) and VEVYX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.33 vs. VEVYX (-12.99). NBRTX return over 5 years is better than : 54.67 vs. VEVYX (19.42).
| NBRTX | VEVYX | NBRTX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.66 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.66 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.421 | -1.135 | -390% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.5M | 15.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.05 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.33 | -12.99 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.93 | -2.70 | -516% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.67 | 19.42 | 282% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.45 | 42.90 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement