Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSMX vs VISGX
NBSMX vs VISGX Comparison
Open Charts NBSMX vs VISGX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Instl
Price$49.70
Change-$0.39 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.85M
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index I
Price$79.02
Change-$0.13 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.46B
NBSMX vs VISGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSMX vs. VISGX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSMX is a Buy and VISGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VISGX has more cash in the bank: 37.5B vs. NBSMX (456M). VISGX pays higher dividends than NBSMX: VISGX (0.42) vs NBSMX (0.00). NBSMX was incepted earlier than VISGX: NBSMX (17 years) vs VISGX (27 years). NBSMX (1.13) is less costly to investors than VISGX (0.19). NBSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. VISGX (21.00). VISGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSMX: VISGX (3000) vs NBSMX (1000000). VISGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.86 vs. NBSMX (9.97). VISGX return over 5 years is better than : 30.99 vs. NBSMX (13.77).
| NBSMX | VISGX | NBSMX / VISGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.19 | 479% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.19 | 595% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.280 | 0.594 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 37.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | 15.86 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 24.40 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.77 | 30.99 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.76 | 118.62 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement