Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSMX vs VISGX
NBSMX vs VISGX Comparison
Open Charts NBSMX vs VISGX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Instl
Price$49.21
Change+$0.48 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets456.72M
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index I
Price$79.16
Change+$0.80 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.95B
NBSMX vs VISGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSMX vs. VISGX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSMX is a Buy and VISGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VISGX has more cash in the bank: 35B vs. NBSMX (457M). VISGX pays higher dividends than NBSMX: VISGX (0.43) vs NBSMX (0.00). NBSMX was incepted earlier than VISGX: NBSMX (17 years) vs VISGX (27 years). NBSMX (1.13) is less costly to investors than VISGX (0.19). NBSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. VISGX (21.00). VISGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSMX: VISGX (3000) vs NBSMX (1000000). VISGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.91 vs. NBSMX (4.28). VISGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.47 vs. NBSMX (21.20).
| NBSMX | VISGX | NBSMX / VISGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.19 | 479% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.19 | 595% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.481 | 0.606 | -244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 457M | 35B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | 12.91 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.32 | 41.73 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.20 | 40.47 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.15 | 115.56 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement