Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSMX vs WCMNX
NBSMX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts NBSMX vs WCMNX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Instl
Price$51.78
Change+$0.49 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets460.98M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.49
Change+$0.08 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
NBSMX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSMX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSMX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBSMX has more cash in the bank: 461M vs. WCMNX (44.8M). NBSMX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . NBSMX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: NBSMX (17 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NBSMX (1.13). NBSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSMX: WCMNX (1000) vs NBSMX (1000000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.52 vs. NBSMX (2.99). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 15.60 vs. NBSMX (14.61).
| NBSMX | WCMNX | NBSMX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 2.04 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.683 | 5.674 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 461M | 44.8M | 1,029% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.99 | 4.52 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.81 | 21.91 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.61 | 15.60 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement