Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSMX vs WCMNX
NBSMX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts NBSMX vs WCMNX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Instl
Price$55.59
Change+$0.87 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets531.25M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.74
Change+$0.20 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
NBSMX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSMX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSMX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBSMX has more cash in the bank: 531M vs. WCMNX (43.7M). NBSMX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . NBSMX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: NBSMX (18 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than NBSMX (1.13). NBSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSMX: WCMNX (1000) vs NBSMX (1000000). NBSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. WCMNX (4.48). NBSMX return over 5 years is better than : 14.72 vs. WCMNX (11.17).
| NBSMX | WCMNX | NBSMX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 2.04 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.550 | 6.698 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 43.7M | 1,215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 4.48 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.06 | 34.06 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.72 | 11.17 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement