NBXG | XLK | NBXG / XLK | |
Gain YTD | 1.607 | -7.174 | -22% |
Net Assets | 1.12B | 66.9B | 2% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.08 | 1,625% |
Turnover | 117.00 | 19.00 | 616% |
Yield | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
Fund Existence | 4 years | 26 years | - |
NBXG | XLK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago89% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago88% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 5 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 30 days ago82% | 16 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBXG and META have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBXG and META's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NBXG | 100% | +0.08% | ||
META - NBXG | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
MPWR - NBXG | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
TSM - NBXG | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
AMAT - NBXG | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
ASML - NBXG | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
XLK | 100% | -0.53% | ||
LRCX - XLK | 83% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
KLAC - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
CDNS - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
AMAT - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
MPWR - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
More |