NBYCF vs VALE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBYCF is a Hold and VALE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NBYCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVALE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NBYCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VALE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
VALE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- VALE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NBYCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +13.80% price change this week, while VALE (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
VALE is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.65% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| NBYCF | VALE | NBYCF / VALE | |
| Capitalization | 5.3M | 51.9B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -4.43M | 15B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 27.322 | 6.371 | 429% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.84 | 6.62 | 527% |
| Revenue | 0 | 40.7B | - |
| Total Cash | 4M | 2.92B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 48.2K | 16.4B | 0% |
NBYCF | VALE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VALE's Valuation (8) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBYCF (74) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew significantly faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.
VALE's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBYCF (100) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.
VALE's SMR Rating (51) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBYCF (94) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBYCF’s over the last 12 months.
NBYCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as VALE (55) in the Steel industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew similarly to VALE’s over the last 12 months.
NBYCF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as VALE (41) in the Steel industry. This means that NBYCF’s stock grew similarly to VALE’s over the last 12 months.
| VALE | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RYVFX | 8.12 | -0.25 | -2.99% |
| Royce Small-Cap Value Service | |||
| PSKCX | 37.28 | -2.01 | -5.12% |
| Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth C | |||
| CTCSX | 29.19 | -1.65 | -5.35% |
| Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth C | |||
| AMRMX | 51.67 | -3.06 | -5.59% |
| American Funds American Mutual A | |||
| FSGAX | 38.20 | -2.48 | -6.10% |
| Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Adv | |||
NBYCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBYCF and RIO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBYCF and RIO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBYCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBYCF | 100% | +15.06% | ||
| RIO - NBYCF | 21% Poorly correlated | -6.44% | ||
| BHP - NBYCF | 21% Poorly correlated | -9.49% | ||
| SCCO - NBYCF | 20% Poorly correlated | -9.62% | ||
| VALE - NBYCF | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.68% | ||
| FCX - NBYCF | 20% Poorly correlated | -13.01% | ||
More | ||||
VALE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VALE has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VALE jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VALE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VALE | 100% | -6.68% | ||
| RIO - VALE | 81% Closely correlated | -6.44% | ||
| BHP - VALE | 76% Closely correlated | -9.49% | ||
| SCCO - VALE | 63% Loosely correlated | -9.62% | ||
| FSUGY - VALE | 62% Loosely correlated | -8.87% | ||
| FCX - VALE | 62% Loosely correlated | -13.01% | ||
More | ||||