NCAUF
Price
$0.61
Change
+$0.03 (+5.17%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
149.42M
NEM
Price
$84.29
Change
-$0.25 (-0.30%)
Updated
Sep 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
93.64B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCAUF vs NEM

Header iconNCAUF vs NEM Comparison
Open Charts NCAUF vs NEMBanner chart's image
Newcore Gold
Price$0.61
Change+$0.03 (+5.17%)
Volume$409.25K
Capitalization149.42M
Newmont
Price$84.29
Change-$0.25 (-0.30%)
Volume$84.14K
Capitalization93.64B
NCAUF vs NEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NCAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCAUF vs. NEM commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCAUF is a Hold and NEM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (NCAUF: $0.61 vs. NEM: $84.54)
Brand notoriety: NCAUF: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCAUF: 584% vs. NEM: 131%
Market capitalization -- NCAUF: $149.42M vs. NEM: $93.64B
NCAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $149.42M. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $93.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $107.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than NCAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCAUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCAUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NCAUF and NEM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NCAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.15% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6148.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($93.6B) has a higher market cap than NCAUF($149M). NCAUF YTD gains are higher at: 184.181 vs. NEM (130.318). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.6B vs. NCAUF (-5.03M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 6.65B vs. NCAUF (10.8M). NEM has higher revenues than NCAUF: NEM (20.6B) vs NCAUF (0).
NCAUFNEMNCAUF / NEM
Capitalization149M93.6B0%
EBITDA-5.03M11.6B-0%
Gain YTD184.181130.318141%
P/E RatioN/A15.32-
Revenue020.6B-
Total Cash10.8M6.65B0%
Total DebtN/A7.61B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCAUF vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings
NCAUF
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8782
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10062
SMR RATING
1..100
9245
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
384
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10056
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEM's Valuation (21) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NCAUF (45) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCAUF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCAUF (92) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCAUF (38) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCAUF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCAUFNEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NCAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KRBN32.800.29
+0.89%
KraneShares Global Carbon ETF
EURL35.470.21
+0.60%
Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3X ETF
VPL88.070.43
+0.49%
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
EPSB22.60-0.05
-0.22%
Harbor Smid Cap Core ETF
OSCV38.09-0.19
-0.51%
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF

NCAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCAUF and DRD have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCAUF and DRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCAUF
1D Price
Change %
NCAUF100%
+4.32%
DRD - NCAUF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.03%
NGD - NCAUF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
NEM - NCAUF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
PAAS - NCAUF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
HSTXF - NCAUF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
More