NDEV
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.8M
SUND
Price
$0.49
Change
+$0.02 (+4.26%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
21.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NDEV vs SUND

Header iconNDEV vs SUND Comparison
Open Charts NDEV vs SUNDBanner chart's image
Novus Acquisition & Development
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$7.18K
Capitalization3.8M
Sundance Strategies
Price$0.49
Change+$0.02 (+4.26%)
Volume$500
Capitalization21.1M
NDEV vs SUND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NDEV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NDEV vs. SUND commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDEV is a Hold and SUND is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (NDEV: $0.03 vs. SUND: $0.49)
Brand notoriety: NDEV and SUND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NDEV: 529% vs. SUND: 24%
Market capitalization -- NDEV: $3.8M vs. SUND: $21.1M
NDEV [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $3.8M. SUND’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $21.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $32.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NDEV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSUND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NDEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SUND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NDEV and SUND are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NDEV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NDEV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SUND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDEV is a better buy in the short-term than SUND.

Price Growth

NDEV (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUND (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +3.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.23% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUND($21.1M) has a higher market cap than NDEV($3.8M). SUND YTD gains are higher at: -23.503 vs. NDEV (-50.000).
NDEVSUNDNDEV / SUND
Capitalization3.8M21.1M18%
EBITDAN/A-1.43M-
Gain YTD-50.000-23.503213%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A55.3K-
Total DebtN/A3.59M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NDEV vs SUND: Fundamental Ratings
NDEV
SUND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5118
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8367
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUND's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as NDEV (100). This means that SUND’s stock grew similarly to NDEV’s over the last 12 months.

SUND's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NDEV (100). This means that SUND’s stock grew similarly to NDEV’s over the last 12 months.

SUND's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NDEV (100). This means that SUND’s stock grew similarly to NDEV’s over the last 12 months.

SUND's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as NDEV (64). This means that SUND’s stock grew similarly to NDEV’s over the last 12 months.

SUND's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as NDEV (83). This means that SUND’s stock grew similarly to NDEV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NDEVSUND
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NDEV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDEN24.630.39
+1.61%
Golden Entertainment
GORO0.730.01
+0.84%
Gold Resource Corp
PCSA0.21N/A
+0.19%
Processa Pharmaceuticals
HCM17.48N/A
N/A
HUTCHMED (China) Limited
XPEV21.29-0.31
-1.44%
XPeng

NDEV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NDEV and SWSDF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NDEV and SWSDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDEV
1D Price
Change %
NDEV100%
-21.05%
SWSDF - NDEV
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNXXF - NDEV
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SZLMY - NDEV
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
SUND - NDEV
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAXPY - NDEV
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
More

SUND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUND and SAXPF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUND and SAXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUND
1D Price
Change %
SUND100%
N/A
SAXPF - SUND
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAXPY - SUND
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
NNGRY - SUND
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
TNXXF - SUND
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWSDF - SUND
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More