Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDGCX vs RWMFX
NDGCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NDGCX vs RWMFX
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth C
Price$24.75
Change-$0.14 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.31M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.35
Change-$0.38 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.3B
NDGCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDGCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDGCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. NDGCX (120M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NDGCX: RWMFX (1.43) vs NDGCX (0.00). NDGCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NDGCX (10 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NDGCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NDGCX (18.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDGCX: RWMFX (250) vs NDGCX (1000). NDGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.93 vs. RWMFX (5.42). NDGCX return over 5 years is better than : 79.90 vs. RWMFX (56.65).
| NDGCX | RWMFX | NDGCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.31 | 584% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.31 | 681% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.319 | 9.070 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 207B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.93 | 5.42 | 294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.56 | 45.07 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.90 | 56.65 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement