NDGPF
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.02 (+5.26%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
SEOAY
Price
$10.32
Change
+$0.08 (+0.78%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
55 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NDGPF vs SEOAY

Header iconNDGPF vs SEOAY Comparison
Open Charts NDGPF vs SEOAYBanner chart's image
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings
Price$0.40
Change+$0.02 (+5.26%)
Volume$6K
CapitalizationN/A
Stora Enso Oyj
Price$10.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.78%)
Volume$118.64K
CapitalizationN/A
NDGPF vs SEOAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
NDGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEOAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NDGPF vs. SEOAY commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDGPF is a Hold and SEOAY is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NDGPF: $0.40 vs. SEOAY: $10.32)
Brand notoriety: NDGPF and SEOAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NDGPF: 158% vs. SEOAY: 88%
Market capitalization -- NDGPF: $3.08B vs. SEOAY: $9.64B
NDGPF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $3.08B. SEOAY’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $9.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NDGPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSEOAY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NDGPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SEOAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEOAY is a better buy in the long-term than NDGPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NDGPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEOAY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NDGPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SEOAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEOAY is a better buy in the short-term than NDGPF.

Price Growth

NDGPF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +3.70% price change this week, while SEOAY (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEOAY is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-1.03% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEOAY($9.64B) has a higher market cap than NDGPF($3.08B). SEOAY has higher P/E ratio than NDGPF: SEOAY (9.61) vs NDGPF (8.25). NDGPF YTD gains are higher at: -18.548 vs. SEOAY (-24.209). SEOAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.96B vs. NDGPF (30.7M). NDGPF has more cash in the bank: 8.39B vs. SEOAY (1.97B). SEOAY has less debt than NDGPF: SEOAY (5.13B) vs NDGPF (51.3B). NDGPF has higher revenues than SEOAY: NDGPF (61.3B) vs SEOAY (10.9B).
NDGPFSEOAYNDGPF / SEOAY
Capitalization3.08B9.64B32%
EBITDA30.7M1.96B2%
Gain YTD-18.548-24.20977%
P/E Ratio8.259.6186%
Revenue61.3B10.9B562%
Total Cash8.39B1.97B425%
Total Debt51.3B5.13B1,001%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NDGPF vs SEOAY: Fundamental Ratings
NDGPF
SEOAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7615
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6233
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SEOAY's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as NDGPF (48). This means that SEOAY’s stock grew similarly to NDGPF’s over the last 12 months.

SEOAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NDGPF (100). This means that SEOAY’s stock grew similarly to NDGPF’s over the last 12 months.

SEOAY's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as NDGPF (99). This means that SEOAY’s stock grew similarly to NDGPF’s over the last 12 months.

NDGPF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SEOAY (63). This means that NDGPF’s stock grew similarly to SEOAY’s over the last 12 months.

SEOAY's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as NDGPF (62). This means that SEOAY’s stock grew similarly to NDGPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NDGPFSEOAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NDGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEOAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSGVX121.29N/A
N/A
State Street Glb All Cap Eq ex-US Idx
TOVIX17.81-0.05
-0.28%
American Beacon EAM Int Small Cap R5
SPINX25.53-0.10
-0.39%
SEI S&P 500 Index A (SIIT)
FAGNX45.26-0.37
-0.81%
Fidelity Advisor Energy M
LSRCX1.98-1.74
-46.81%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C

NDGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NDGPF and LMPMF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NDGPF and LMPMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDGPF
1D Price
Change %
NDGPF100%
N/A
LMPMF - NDGPF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDGPY - NDGPF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMPMY - NDGPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OJIPF - NDGPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEOAY - NDGPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
More

SEOAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEOAY has been closely correlated with UPMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEOAY jumps, then UPMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEOAY
1D Price
Change %
SEOAY100%
+0.78%
UPMMY - SEOAY
70%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
MONDY - SEOAY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
MERC - SEOAY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
UPMKF - SEOAY
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.79%
SLVM - SEOAY
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
More