It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NDGPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPPJY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NDGPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPPJY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
NDGPY (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPPJY (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -3.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.17%.
SPPJY is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
NDGPY | SPPJY | NDGPY / SPPJY | |
Capitalization | 3.08B | 1.23B | 251% |
EBITDA | 30.7M | 1.03B | 3% |
Gain YTD | -8.506 | 27.436 | -31% |
P/E Ratio | 8.18 | 2.72 | 301% |
Revenue | 61.3B | 6.84B | 896% |
Total Cash | 8.39B | 557M | 1,506% |
Total Debt | 51.3B | 1.78B | 2,879% |
NDGPY | SPPJY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 44 | 41 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SPPJY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as NDGPY (50). This means that SPPJY’s stock grew similarly to NDGPY’s over the last 12 months.
SPPJY's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as NDGPY (100). This means that SPPJY’s stock grew similarly to NDGPY’s over the last 12 months.
SPPJY's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as NDGPY (99). This means that SPPJY’s stock grew similarly to NDGPY’s over the last 12 months.
NDGPY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SPPJY (49). This means that NDGPY’s stock grew similarly to SPPJY’s over the last 12 months.
NDGPY's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPPJY (75). This means that NDGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPPJY’s over the last 12 months.
NDGPY | SPPJY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 6 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago38% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NDGPY and LMPMY have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NDGPY and LMPMY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDGPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NDGPY | 100% | N/A | ||
LMPMY - NDGPY | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LMPMF - NDGPY | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NDGPF - NDGPY | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MONDY - NDGPY | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
SPPJY - NDGPY | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.11% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPPJY and SEOAY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPPJY and SEOAY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPPJY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPPJY | 100% | -3.11% | ||
SEOAY - SPPJY | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
LMPMY - SPPJY | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
UPMKF - SPPJY | 7% Poorly correlated | -5.79% | ||
MONDY - SPPJY | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
OJIPF - SPPJY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |