Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDVVX vs SSGSX
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVVX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value R6
Price$18.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.98
Change+$0.52 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.66B
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.66B vs. NDVVX (2.77B). NDVVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVVX (1.91) vs SSGSX (0.51). NDVVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVVX (13 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NDVVX (0.87). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVVX (34.00). NDVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). NDVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.33 vs. SSGSX (-11.31). NDVVX return over 5 years is better than : 39.53 vs. SSGSX (21.70).
| NDVVX | SSGSX | NDVVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.26 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.298 | -4.243 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 5.66B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 0.51 | 377% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.33 | -11.31 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.55 | 1.30 | 427% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.53 | 21.70 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.06 | 14.39 | 299% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers