Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDVVX vs SSGSX
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVVX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value R6
Price$17.66
Change+$0.28 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.74B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.83
Change+$0.68 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. NDVVX (2.74B). NDVVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVVX (1.97) vs SSGSX (0.52). NDVVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVVX (13 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NDVVX (0.85). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVVX (34.00). NDVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). NDVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.50 vs. SSGSX (-5.89). NDVVX return over 5 years is better than : 42.95 vs. SSGSX (27.23).
| NDVVX | SSGSX | NDVVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.26 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.26 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.923 | -7.064 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.74B | 5.56B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 0.52 | 375% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.50 | -5.89 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.80 | -3.81 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.95 | 27.23 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.01 | 10.33 | 378% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers