Ad is loading...
NDVVX vs SSGSX
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVVX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value R6
Price$16.25
Change-$1.29 (-7.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.07B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.36
Change-$3.24 (-7.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.88B
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. NDVVX (3.07B). NDVVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVVX (1.95) vs SSGSX (0.52). NDVVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVVX (13 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NDVVX (0.85). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVVX (34.00). NDVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). NDVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.00 vs. SSGSX (-9.24). NDVVX return over 5 years is better than : 80.86 vs. SSGSX (51.13).
| NDVVX | SSGSX | NDVVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.26 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.26 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.048 | -6.095 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.07B | 5.88B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 0.52 | 378% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.00 | -9.24 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.94 | -10.59 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.86 | 51.13 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.18 | 10.74 | 374% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...