Ad is loading...
NDVVX vs SSGSX
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVVX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value R6
Price$16.34
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.43
Change-$0.26 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.38B vs. NDVVX (2.65B). NDVVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVVX (1.95) vs SSGSX (0.52). NDVVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVVX (13 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NDVVX (0.85). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVVX (34.00). NDVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). NDVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.16 vs. SSGSX (-12.70). NDVVX return over 5 years is better than : 47.39 vs. SSGSX (25.11).
| NDVVX | SSGSX | NDVVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.26 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.26 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.613 | -12.923 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 5.38B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 0.52 | 378% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.16 | -12.70 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.35 | -13.46 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.39 | 25.11 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.62 | 3.15 | 942% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers