Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDVVX vs SSGSX
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts NDVVX vs SSGSX
MFS New Discovery Value R6
Price$18.06
Change-$0.19 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.8B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.54
Change-$0.45 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
NDVVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDVVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDVVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. NDVVX (2.8B). NDVVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: NDVVX (1.60) vs SSGSX (0.48). NDVVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: NDVVX (13 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than NDVVX (0.87). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NDVVX (34.00). NDVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: NDVVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). NDVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.76 vs. SSGSX (-3.68). NDVVX return over 5 years is better than : 37.16 vs. SSGSX (20.58).
| NDVVX | SSGSX | NDVVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.26 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.011 | 1.206 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.8B | 5.44B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.48 | 336% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.76 | -3.68 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.08 | 7.50 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.16 | 20.58 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.48 | 20.51 | 256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers