Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAMX vs RWMHX
NEAMX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts NEAMX vs RWMHX
Neiman Large Cap Value A
Price$37.15
Change+$0.26 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.19M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$68.68
Change+$0.42 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.91B
NEAMX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAMX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAMX is a Buy and RWMHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 212B vs. NEAMX (41.2M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than NEAMX: RWMHX (1.30) vs NEAMX (0.78). NEAMX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: NEAMX (13 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). NEAMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NEAMX (8.32). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEAMX: RWMHX (250) vs NEAMX (2500). NEAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.65 vs. RWMHX (6.18). RWMHX (46.64) and NEAMX (45.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NEAMX | RWMHX | NEAMX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.41 | 320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.41 | 420% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.945 | 13.020 | 145% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.2M | 212B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.30 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.65 | 6.18 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.61 | 33.62 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.55 | 46.64 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.35 | 77.34 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement