Advertisement
NEGXF vs PFHO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEGXF is a Hold and PFHO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NEGXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFHO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NEGXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PFHO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PFHO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PFHO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
NEGXF (@Managed Health Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PFHO (@Managed Health Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -6.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.07%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (-6.63% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
| NEGXF | PFHO | NEGXF / PFHO | |
| Capitalization | 12.5M | 10.9M | 115% |
| EBITDA | 3.12M | 553K | 564% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 11.188 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 7.29 | 21.23 | 34% |
| Revenue | 12.6M | 5.63M | 224% |
| Total Cash | 1.79M | 10.8M | 17% |
| Total Debt | 637K | 41.2K | 1,546% |
NEGXF | PFHO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NEGXF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFHO (66). This means that NEGXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFHO’s over the last 12 months.
NEGXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as PFHO (100). This means that NEGXF’s stock grew similarly to PFHO’s over the last 12 months.
PFHO's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as NEGXF (78). This means that PFHO’s stock grew similarly to NEGXF’s over the last 12 months.
PFHO's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as NEGXF (57). This means that PFHO’s stock grew similarly to NEGXF’s over the last 12 months.
PFHO's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEGXF (100). This means that PFHO’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEGXF’s over the last 12 months.
| NEGXF | PFHO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 19% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 19% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
NEGXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NEGXF and ALHC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEGXF and ALHC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEGXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEGXF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALHC - NEGXF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| OSCR - NEGXF | -1% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| NEUE - NEGXF | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| PFHO - NEGXF | -4% Poorly correlated | N/A |
PFHO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PFHO and OSCR have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFHO and OSCR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFHO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFHO | 100% | N/A | ||
| OSCR - PFHO | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| ALHC - PFHO | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| NEUE - PFHO | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| NEGXF - PFHO | -4% Poorly correlated | N/A |