Ad is loading...
NEMAX vs RNWFX
NEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts NEMAX vs RNWFX
Neuberger Berman Emerg Mkts Eq A
Price$20.42
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets188.73M
American Funds New World R5
Price$79.18
Change+$0.21 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.88B
NEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEMAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 61.9B vs. NEMAX (189M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than NEMAX: RNWFX (1.17) vs NEMAX (0.00). NEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: NEMAX (16 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). NEMAX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). NEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs NEMAX (1000). NEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. RNWFX (1.13). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.43 vs. NEMAX (34.83).
| NEMAX | RNWFX | NEMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.62 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.62 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.872 | 2.485 | 156% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189M | 61.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | 1.13 | 932% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.35 | 4.15 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 54.43 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.42 | 46.94 | 61% |