NETD
Price
$11.60
Change
+$0.04 (+0.35%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
247.66M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RDACU
Price
$12.00
Change
-$0.21 (-1.72%)
Updated
Nov 19, 11:27 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NETD vs RDACU

Header iconNETD vs RDACU Comparison
Open Charts NETD vs RDACUBanner chart's image
Nabors Energy Transition
Price$11.60
Change+$0.04 (+0.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization247.66M
Rising Dragon Acquisition
Price$12.00
Change-$0.21 (-1.72%)
Volume$150
CapitalizationN/A
NETD vs RDACU Comparison Chart in %
NETD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RDACU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NETD vs. RDACU commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NETD is a Hold and RDACU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (NETD: $11.56 vs. RDACU: $12.21)
Brand notoriety: NETD and RDACU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NETD: 543% vs. RDACU: 143%
Market capitalization -- NETD: $247.66M vs. RDACU: $0
NETD [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $247.66M. RDACU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.78M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NETD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRDACU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NETD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RDACU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NETD and RDACU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NETD’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDACU’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NETD’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RDACU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NETD is a better buy in the short-term than RDACU.

Price Growth

NETD (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +1.94% price change this week, while RDACU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +16.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.48% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDACU YTD gains are higher at: 19.823 vs. NETD (7.037). NETD has more cash in the bank: 1.18M vs. RDACU (83.4K). RDACU has less debt than NETD: RDACU (162K) vs NETD (3.05M).
NETDRDACUNETD / RDACU
Capitalization248MN/A-
EBITDA-7.15MN/A-
Gain YTD7.03719.82335%
P/E Ratio290.00N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.18M83.4K1,412%
Total Debt3.05M162K1,883%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NETDRDACU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NETD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RDACU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDUFF0.100.03
+34.27%
Radius Gold Inc.
HCMLF94.80N/A
N/A
HOLCIM LTD
JNBYF2.09N/A
N/A
JNBY Design Ltd.
MPCB14.77N/A
N/A
Mountain Pacific Bancorp Inc.
HHSSF0.42N/A
N/A
Huishang Bank Corp Ltd.

RDACU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDACU has been loosely correlated with NETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RDACU jumps, then NETD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDACU
1D Price
Change %
RDACU100%
+16.29%
NETD - RDACU
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
OAKU - RDACU
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
GIG - RDACU
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
RFAI - RDACU
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
TVACU - RDACU
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More