Ad is loading...
NETDU
Price
$10.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
SREDF
Price
$10.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

NETDU vs SREDF

Header iconNETDU vs SREDF Comparison
Open Charts NETDU vs SREDFBanner chart's image
Nabors Energy Transition
Price$10.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$508
CapitalizationN/A
StoreBrand ASA
Price$10.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.91K
CapitalizationN/A
NETDU vs SREDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NETDU vs. SREDF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NETDU is a Sell and SREDF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NETDU: $10.66 vs. SREDF: $10.95)
Brand notoriety: NETDU and SREDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NETDU: 24% vs. SREDF: 149%
Market capitalization -- NETDU: $12 vs. SREDF: $4.73B
NETDU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $12. SREDF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $4.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NETDU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSREDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NETDU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SREDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SREDF is a better buy in the long-term than NETDU.

Price Growth

NETDU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SREDF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.64% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SREDF($4.74B) has a higher market cap than NETDU($12). SREDF YTD gains are higher at: 27.414 vs. NETDU (1.718). SREDF has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. NETDU (2.02M). NETDU has less debt than SREDF: NETDU (3.05M) vs SREDF (52.1B).
NETDUSREDFNETDU / SREDF
Capitalization124.74B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.71827.4146%
P/E RatioN/A10.65-
RevenueN/A120B-
Total Cash2.02M11.8B0%
Total Debt3.05M52.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SREDF: Fundamental Ratings
SREDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HILDX18.52-0.01
-0.05%
Hartford International Value F
MBLAX13.04-0.03
-0.23%
Madison Diversified Income A
EMILX15.85-0.05
-0.31%
Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Equity I
GSVRX17.43-0.06
-0.34%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value R
GLCRX31.08-0.71
-2.23%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R

NETDU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NETDU has been loosely correlated with PBAJ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NETDU jumps, then PBAJ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NETDU
1D Price
Change %
NETDU100%
N/A
PBAJ - NETDU
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FSTJ - NETDU
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SREDF - NETDU
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKU - NETDU
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBMC - NETDU
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

SREDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SREDF has been loosely correlated with MSSAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SREDF jumps, then MSSAU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SREDF
1D Price
Change %
SREDF100%
N/A
MSSAU - SREDF
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ONYX - SREDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGY - SREDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETDU - SREDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - SREDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-18.37%
More