Advertisement
NETDU vs UMAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NETDU is a StrongBuy and UMAC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NETDU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUMAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NETDU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UMAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NETDU’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NETDU’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- UMAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NETDU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UMAC (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
UMAC is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.01% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Computer Processing Hardware (-0.63% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| NETDU | UMAC | NETDU / UMAC | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 288M | - |
| EBITDA | -7.15M | -39.34M | 18% |
| Gain YTD | 4.336 | -43.163 | -10% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 7.7M | - |
| Total Cash | 1.18M | 38.9M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 3.05M | 297K | 1,027% |
| NETDU | UMAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 9% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 7% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
NETDU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NETDU and UMAC have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NETDU and UMAC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NETDU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NETDU | 100% | N/A | ||
| UMAC - NETDU | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.13% | ||
| ALCYU - NETDU | 12% Poorly correlated | -3.86% | ||
| NETD - NETDU | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| QETA - NETDU | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SPKL - NETDU | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||
UMAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMAC has been loosely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMAC jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMAC | 100% | +3.13% | ||
| RGTI - UMAC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| QBTS - UMAC | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| IONQ - UMAC | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| QUBT - UMAC | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| QMCO - UMAC | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.34% | ||
More | ||||