Ad is loading...
NEXA
Price
$7.77
Change
-$0.09 (-1.15%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
88 days until earnings call
SXOOF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

NEXA vs SXOOF

Header iconNEXA vs SXOOF Comparison
Open Charts NEXA vs SXOOFBanner chart's image
Nexa Resources SA
Price$7.77
Change-$0.09 (-1.15%)
Volume$77.55K
CapitalizationN/A
St Georges Eco Mng
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31.89K
CapitalizationN/A
NEXA vs SXOOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NEXA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NEXA vs. SXOOF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEXA is a Sell and SXOOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NEXA: $7.77 vs. SXOOF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: NEXA and SXOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NEXA: 332% vs. SXOOF: 33%
Market capitalization -- NEXA: $940.31M vs. SXOOF: $24.01M
NEXA [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $940.31M. SXOOF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $24.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NEXA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSXOOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NEXA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SXOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEXA is a better buy in the long-term than SXOOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEXA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NEXA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NEXA (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.26% price change this week, while SXOOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEXA is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEXA($940M) has a higher market cap than SXOOF($24M). NEXA YTD gains are higher at: 8.824 vs. SXOOF (-53.428). NEXA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 190M vs. SXOOF (-9.5M). NEXA has more cash in the bank: 468M vs. SXOOF (3.86M). SXOOF has less debt than NEXA: SXOOF (11.2M) vs NEXA (1.74B). NEXA has higher revenues than SXOOF: NEXA (2.57B) vs SXOOF (0).
NEXASXOOFNEXA / SXOOF
Capitalization940M24M3,917%
EBITDA190M-9.5M-2,000%
Gain YTD8.824-53.428-17%
P/E Ratio16.21N/A-
Revenue2.57B0-
Total Cash468M3.86M12,134%
Total Debt1.74B11.2M15,491%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEXA vs SXOOF: Fundamental Ratings
NEXA
SXOOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4664
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEXA's Valuation (3) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for SXOOF (98) in the null industry. This means that NEXA’s stock grew significantly faster than SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

NEXA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as SXOOF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEXA’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

NEXA's SMR Rating (91) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as SXOOF (97) in the null industry. This means that NEXA’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

NEXA's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as SXOOF (64) in the null industry. This means that NEXA’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

NEXA's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for SXOOF (97) in the null industry. This means that NEXA’s stock grew significantly faster than SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEXA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NEXA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLADX9.42-0.03
-0.32%
BlackRock Managed Income Investor A
JMVAX17.61-0.15
-0.84%
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value I
RYSYX75.26-1.01
-1.32%
Rydex S&P 500 C
SLCCX42.34-0.85
-1.97%
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth C
VSPIX36.07-0.73
-1.98%
Victory Special Value I

NEXA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEXA has been loosely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NEXA jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEXA
1D Price
Change %
NEXA100%
-1.15%
HBM - NEXA
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
SCCO - NEXA
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
FCX - NEXA
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
TECK - NEXA
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
CSCCF - NEXA
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
More

SXOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SXOOF and NEXA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SXOOF and NEXA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXOOF
1D Price
Change %
SXOOF100%
-7.46%
NEXA - SXOOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
BMTLF - SXOOF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.67%
SRLZF - SXOOF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
TLGRF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.75%
TCKRF - SXOOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More