It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NWL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NFE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NWL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -2.03% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.99%.
NWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
NFE | NWL | NFE / NWL | |
Capitalization | 6.18B | 3.26B | 190% |
EBITDA | 1.11B | 74M | 1,501% |
Gain YTD | -83.532 | -45.496 | 184% |
P/E Ratio | 11.37 | 25.84 | 44% |
Revenue | 2.41B | 8.13B | 30% |
Total Cash | 155M | 332M | 47% |
Total Debt | 7.37B | 5.47B | 135% |
NFE | NWL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NWL's Valuation (12) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for NFE (92) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew significantly faster than NFE’s over the last 12 months.
NWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NFE (100) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew similarly to NFE’s over the last 12 months.
NWL's SMR Rating (91) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NFE (91) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew similarly to NFE’s over the last 12 months.
NWL's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFE (98) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFE’s over the last 12 months.
NWL's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFE (73) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFE’s over the last 12 months.
NFE | NWL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 19 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 4 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 2 days ago66% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TOIIX | 17.00 | 0.04 | +0.24% |
Touchstone International Value Instl | |||
BARAX | 93.70 | 0.15 | +0.16% |
Baron Asset Retail | |||
GLRIX | 21.97 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Instl | |||
CNPFX | 65.13 | -0.08 | -0.12% |
American Funds New Perspective 529F | |||
LZIEX | 18.77 | -0.03 | -0.16% |
Lazard International Equity Instl |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NFE and BIPC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NFE and BIPC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NFE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NFE | 100% | -6.04% | ||
BIPC - NFE | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
OPAL - NFE | 27% Poorly correlated | -4.05% | ||
SPH - NFE | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
ENGGY - NFE | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
UGI - NFE | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWL has been loosely correlated with HELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWL jumps, then HELE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NWL | 100% | -1.49% | ||
HELE - NWL | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
SPB - NWL | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
ELF - NWL | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
COTY - NWL | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
EPC - NWL | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More |