This stock comparison examines NWL and SPB, two consumer goods companies navigating macroeconomic pressures like shifting consumer spending and supply chain dynamics. Both firms produce essential household and personal care products, making them relevant for value-oriented investors seeking defensive exposure in staples. Traders focused on relative performance may find value in their divergent momentum: NWL's turnaround efforts versus SPB's steady growth. This analysis draws on recent earnings, market positioning, and sector trends to highlight contrasts in recent market activity.
Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) designs, manufactures, and distributes consumer products across home solutions, learning tools, and outdoor gear under brands like Sharpie, Rubbermaid, and Coleman. In recent weeks, shares have fluctuated around $4.30, within a 52-week range of $3.07–$6.64, reflecting broader consumer discretionary pressures. Q1 2026 results showed revenue of $1.55 billion, a narrower loss with EPS of -$0.05 beating estimates of -$0.09, and gross margins expanding to 33.1%. Management raised its full-year sales outlook to flat to +2%, citing tax refunds and cost controls, sparking gains of up to 11.5% post-earnings. Sentiment has improved on strategic initiatives like product launches (e.g., Sharpie-Elmer's Toy Story collection) and a $0.07 dividend declaration, though core sales dipped 3.5% amid inventory adjustments. Analysts maintain neutral ratings with targets around $5.00, balancing turnaround progress against high debt and negative net margins of -3.91%.
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) focuses on branded home essentials, pet care, and garden products via segments like Home & Personal Care and Global Pet Care, with brands in appliances, grooming, and pest control. Trading near $81 within a 52-week range of $49.99–$86.96, shares have shown resilience with YTD gains of 39%. Fiscal Q2 2026 delivered net sales of $708.9 million, up 4.9% year-over-year, and adjusted EBITDA of $84 million, up 17.8%, with EPS of $1.25 topping forecasts. Organic growth excluding FX rose 1.5%, supported by pet and home categories amid steady demand. A $0.47 quarterly dividend underscores confidence. Analyst upgrades, including Canaccord's Buy rating and $100 target, reflect optimism on digital sales and portfolio strength. Performance contrasts softer recent weeks with robust multi-quarter momentum, aided by lower beta (0.67) and positive operating margins around 4.5%.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots out of over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. These bots are dynamically selected by AI analysis for their suitability in current market conditions, emphasizing momentum, sector rotation, and high-growth areas like technology and energy. Performance highlights include annualized returns up to 227%, win rates of 70–80%, and profit factors exceeding 2.5 in top agents, with some achieving 279% returns in short-term setups. Short-term bots focus on 15–60 minute frames for volatile plays, while longer-term ones target swing trades. Traders can explore these for pattern recognition and real-time signals. Visit Trending AI Robots to review stats and copy top performers tailored to today's environment.
Both NWL and SPB thrive in consumer staples, but diverge in scale and focus: NWL's broader portfolio ($7.2B TTM revenue) spans writing tools and outdoor versus SPB's concentrated home/pet/garden ($2.8B revenue). Growth drivers differ—SPB benefits from pet care resilience (4.9% sales growth), while NWL pursues cost savings amid -3.5% core sales decline. Recent momentum favors SPB (39% YTD vs. 18%), with superior ROE and margins (4.5% operating vs. 2.7%). Risk profiles contrast: NWL's higher beta (1.06) and debt load amplify volatility, while SPB offers stability (beta 0.67). Market sentiment tilts to SPB via Buy ratings and $87+ targets, versus NWL's neutral $5.00 consensus, highlighting trade-offs in value versus growth.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors SPB based on stronger trend consistency, positive earnings momentum, and relative stability in recent market activity. Observable catalysts like sales growth and analyst upgrades position it ahead probabilistically, though NWL's undervaluation and outlook lift could narrow the gap if execution persists.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NWL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSPB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NWL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPB’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
NWL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +5.78% price change this week, while SPB (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.38%.
NWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
SPB is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| NWL | SPB | NWL / SPB | |
| Capitalization | 2.14B | 1.93B | 111% |
| EBITDA | 341M | 226M | 151% |
| Gain YTD | 40.180 | 42.710 | 94% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 16.27 | - |
| Revenue | 7.19B | 2.82B | 255% |
| Total Cash | 201M | 125M | 161% |
| Total Debt | 5.52B | 726M | 761% |
NWL | SPB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NWL's Valuation (8) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SPB (24) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew similarly to SPB’s over the last 12 months.
SPB's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as NWL (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that SPB’s stock grew similarly to NWL’s over the last 12 months.
SPB's SMR Rating (82) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as NWL (95) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that SPB’s stock grew similarly to NWL’s over the last 12 months.
NWL's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SPB (40) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew similarly to SPB’s over the last 12 months.
NWL's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPB (83) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that NWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPB’s over the last 12 months.
| NWL | SPB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 71% | 26 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 51% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPB has been loosely correlated with EPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPB jumps, then EPC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPB | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| EPC - SPB | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| ACU - SPB | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| NWL - SPB | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| MAGN - SPB | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| IPAR - SPB | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
More | ||||