Ad is loading...
NFEAX vs VIGRX
NFEAX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NFEAX vs VIGRX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp A
Price$14.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$181.21
Change+$0.19 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.76B
NFEAX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEAX vs. VIGRX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEAX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. NFEAX (1.05B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NFEAX: VIGRX (0.39) vs NFEAX (0.00). NFEAX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NFEAX (27 years) vs VIGRX (32 years). NFEAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). NFEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. VIGRX (5.00). NFEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: NFEAX (2000) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.27 vs. NFEAX (-1.01). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 105.37 vs. NFEAX (-18.13).
| NFEAX | VIGRX | NFEAX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.17 | 618% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.17 | 665% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.310 | -11.676 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.01 | 8.27 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.65 | 34.14 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.13 | 105.37 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.06 | 237.17 | -11% |