Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEPX vs RGAHX
NFEPX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NFEPX vs RGAHX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$22.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.28
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
NFEPX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEPX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEPX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NFEPX (1.33B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NFEPX: RGAHX (0.46) vs NFEPX (0.00). NFEPX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NFEPX (28 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). NFEPX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: RGAHX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.72 vs. NFEPX (16.84). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.22 vs. NFEPX (-3.70).
| NFEPX | RGAHX | NFEPX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.44 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.434 | 18.845 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.84 | 17.72 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.10 | 63.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.70 | 49.22 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement