NFGC
Price
$1.58
Change
-$0.02 (-1.25%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
362.81M
8 days until earnings call
PROBF
Price
$1.67
Change
+$0.02 (+1.21%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
339.91M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NFGC vs PROBF

Header iconNFGC vs PROBF Comparison
Open Charts NFGC vs PROBFBanner chart's image
New Found Gold
Price$1.58
Change-$0.02 (-1.25%)
Volume$426.14K
Capitalization362.81M
PROBE GOLD
Price$1.67
Change+$0.02 (+1.21%)
Volume$32.6K
Capitalization339.91M
NFGC vs PROBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PROBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NFGC vs. PROBF commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFGC is a Hold and PROBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (NFGC: $1.58 vs. PROBF: $1.67)
Brand notoriety: NFGC and PROBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NFGC: 61% vs. PROBF: 116%
Market capitalization -- NFGC: $362.81M vs. PROBF: $339.91M
NFGC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $362.81M. PROBF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $339.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NFGC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePROBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NFGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PROBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NFGC and PROBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NFGC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PROBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NFGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PROBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PROBF is a better buy in the short-term than NFGC.

Price Growth

NFGC (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.33% price change this week, while PROBF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4660.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

NFGC is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFGC($363M) has a higher market cap than PROBF($340M). PROBF YTD gains are higher at: 39.167 vs. NFGC (-13.187). PROBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -29.3M vs. NFGC (-45.21M). NFGC has more cash in the bank: 12.9M vs. PROBF (11.6M). NFGC has less debt than PROBF: NFGC (101K) vs PROBF (391K). NFGC (0) and PROBF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NFGCPROBFNFGC / PROBF
Capitalization363M340M107%
EBITDA-45.21M-29.3M154%
Gain YTD-13.18739.167-34%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash12.9M11.6M111%
Total Debt101K391K26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PROBF: Fundamental Ratings
PROBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NFGCPROBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PROBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGKCX13.390.06
+0.45%
Morgan Stanley Global Permanence C
FCDTX34.630.14
+0.41%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp M
GOVIX18.800.04
+0.21%
GMO Resources IV
TVRRX82.37N/A
N/A
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core R5
ZVNBX41.60-0.78
-1.84%
Zevenbergen Growth Investor

NFGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFGC has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFGC jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFGC
1D Price
Change %
NFGC100%
-1.25%
TORXF - NFGC
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
KNTNF - NFGC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
WDOFF - NFGC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
LUGDF - NFGC
49%
Loosely correlated
+6.43%
EDVMF - NFGC
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
More

PROBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PROBF and THM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PROBF and THM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PROBF
1D Price
Change %
PROBF100%
+1.21%
THM - PROBF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFGC - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
TORXF - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
BTG - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-6.53%
KGC - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
More