Ad is loading...
NFLDF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
PCRAF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Ad is loading...

NFLDF vs PCRAF

Header iconNFLDF vs PCRAF Comparison
Open Charts NFLDF vs PCRAFBanner chart's image
Exploits Discovery
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$19.6K
CapitalizationN/A
Pucara Gold
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
NFLDF vs PCRAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NFLDF vs. PCRAF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFLDF is a Hold and PCRAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NFLDF: $0.04 vs. PCRAF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: NFLDF and PCRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NFLDF: 15% vs. PCRAF: 76%
Market capitalization -- NFLDF: $12.7M vs. PCRAF: $2.02M
NFLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.7M. PCRAF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NFLDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePCRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NFLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PCRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NFLDF is a better buy in the long-term than PCRAF.

Price Growth

NFLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -24.04% price change this week, while PCRAF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFLDF($12.7M) has a higher market cap than PCRAF($2.02M). PCRAF YTD gains are higher at: 39.250 vs. NFLDF (-60.614). PCRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.96M vs. NFLDF (-9.63M). NFLDF has more cash in the bank: 8.44M vs. PCRAF (985K). NFLDF (0) and PCRAF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NFLDFPCRAFNFLDF / PCRAF
Capitalization12.7M2.02M628%
EBITDA-9.63M-1.96M492%
Gain YTD-60.61439.250-154%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash8.44M985K857%
Total DebtN/A5.66K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNYCHF0.120.00
+1.04%
China Yuan - Switzerland Franc
CADAUD1.100.01
+0.84%
Canadian Dollar - Australian Dollar
XTRE48.860.07
+0.14%
BondBloxx Bloomberg ThreeYrTrgDurUSTrETF
DBC21.82-0.11
-0.50%
Invesco DB Commodity Tracking
RFG50.01-0.88
-1.72%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF

NFLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NFLDF and ASM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NFLDF and ASM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFLDF
1D Price
Change %
NFLDF100%
+8.84%
ASM - NFLDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.21%
ISVLF - NFLDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+21.08%
FNLPF - NFLDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
PLG - NFLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
SLSR - NFLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
More

PCRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCRAF and CCHI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCRAF and CCHI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCRAF
1D Price
Change %
PCRAF100%
N/A
CCHI - PCRAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHNR - PCRAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MWSNF - PCRAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.08%
NFLDF - PCRAF
12%
Poorly correlated
+8.84%
SUNPF - PCRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More